● 45th Parliament — 1st session   ● recorded nominal votes   ● bills tracked   ● bills challenged by citizens   ● independent citizen-run site · real public data    ● 45th Parliament — 1st session   ● recorded nominal votes   ● bills tracked   ● bills challenged by citizens   ● independent citizen-run site · real public data   
BCABSKMBONQCNBNSPENL
DossierCanada
QCNBNSPENL
100%
FR
Who sits, who legislates, who votes how

DossierCanada — who sits and votes in Canada's Parliament

Challenged bills

✋ Challenge a bill

Recently active bills

See all →

Federal MPs

Who represents you, how they vote, how often they sit.

The federal Cabinet

Who decides what, since when, and how they vote.
Up to date. These ministers come directly from the official Cabinet page on pm.gc.ca, scraped live — not a hand-maintained list.

C-223 — An Act to amend the Divorce Act

Every bill summarized in plain language. Not clear enough? Ask for an explanation.
All statusesIn progressDefeatedAssented to
House of CommonsSenateLobbying 43Omnibus 13
C-223 An Act to amend the Divorce Act 14 LPC In progress ▾
BILL C-223

An Act to amend the Divorce Act

Last activity : At consideration in committee in the House of Commons
Private Member’s Bill · Sponsor : Lisa Hepfner
LPC In progress
Sponsor : Lisa Hepfner · House of Commons · Private Member’s Bill
Commons · 1st2025-09-18Commons · 2nd2026-02-04Commons · 3rdSenate · 1stSenate · 2ndSenate · 3rdRoyal assent
− Hide summary
What it does, in plain language
  • Amends the Divorce Act under the short title “Keeping Children Safe Act”, introduced at first reading on September 18, 2025 by Ms. Hepfner.
  • Requires a lawyer acting for a spouse in a divorce to assess whether there are reasonable grounds to believe there is a risk of family violence and, if so, to put an appropriate plan and a family safety plan in place and tell the spouse about available support services.
  • Bars courts, when deciding a child's best interests, from considering claims that one parent is deliberately manipulating a child to reject the other parent, with a narrow exception where the parent accused of interfering has themselves committed family violence.
  • Prohibits courts from inferring that family violence has stopped or that reports were exaggerated solely because the spouses have separated, no complaints or criminal charges were made, allegations came late, statements were inconsistent, the couple still lives together, or there are no visible injuries.
  • Removes any presumption that equal parenting time or ongoing contact with both parents is best for the child, and bars orders that force a child into “reunification therapy” (any program meant to rebuild a bond with a rejected parent) or that cut a close parent's time to improve the child's relationship with the other parent.
  • Allows a court to hear the child's own views in writing or in a closed-door interview with an amicus curiae present, but only if it is in the child's best interests, both spouses agree, the child's safety and privacy are protected, and no other option exists; what the child says is shared with the parents only if that serves the child's best interests.
  • Shifts the burden of proof in relocation cases: if the child mostly lives with the parent who wants to move, the court must approve the move unless the objecting parent proves otherwise, and the court must presume that parent will move either way.
  • Provides that cases already underway when the law takes effect are decided under the new rules, and that a past decision based on a parental-manipulation allegation counts as a change in circumstances allowing a request to vary the order.

🤖 AI-generated from the bill’s official text as introduced — may not reflect amendments adopted since.

Registered lobbying 14 communications · 2 organizations as of Sep 10, 2026 the 10 most recent +
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW10Women's Legal Education and Action Fund4
2026-08-11 · House of Commons
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Lisa Hepfner — Member of Parliament
2026-07-23 · House of Commons
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Doly Begum — Member of Parliament
2026-05-28 · Justice Canada (JC)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Alicia Cooke — Policy advisor
2026-05-28 · Prime Minister's Office (PMO)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Laura Colleony — Conseillère régionale, Québec
2026-05-28 · House of Commons
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Nathalie Provost — Member of Parliament
2026-05-28 · House of Commons
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Marie-Gabrielle Ménard — Member of Parliament
2026-05-27 · House of Commons
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Alicia Cooke — Policy Advisor
2026-05-25 · Justice Canada (JC)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Claire Farid — Director General and Senior General Counsel
2026-05-25 · Prime Minister's Office (PMO)
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Alyth Roos — Special Assistant Policy
2026-05-21 · House of Commons
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN AND THE LAW
Met with : Alicia Cooke — Policy Advisor

Communications reported to the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying that name this bill. Lobbying is a lawful, publicly registered activity — this count is a fact, not a verdict. Only communications whose description names both the bill number and its title are counted, so the real total may be higher. Registry archive read on September 10, 2026; the Commissioner republishes it about monthly, and we refresh it by hand.

✋ What does “challenging” mean?

Clicking “Ask for an explanation” is a citizen request for the bill's sponsor to explain it in plain language — and for us to keep an eye on it together.

An account (email) is required — one request per person, no anonymous requests. 🔥 At 1,000 requests on the same bill, a public post is made, in the hope an MP agrees to sponsor a petition to the House.

It works on any bill, including one that has already received royal assent — that is often the one people want to understand.

Votes in the Commons

Every recorded vote — who voted what, and by what margin.
On the “who voted what” detail — the House of Commons publishes each member's name for every recorded (nominal) vote (Yea / Nay / paired). The by-member breakdown above (the "+" button on each row) comes directly from that official source (ourcommons.ca), not an estimate. The party shown next to each name is taken from the current House roster; people who have since left the House appear separately under "Former members".

How to read a vote

Recorded vote

Members vote one by one and each choice is entered in the public record. That is what lets us say exactly who voted what — no interpretation.

Passed is not law

A passed vote clears ONE stage. A bill must pass both chambers and then receive royal assent before it becomes law.

Paired is not absent

In the Commons, two members from opposing sides can agree not to vote: their voices cancel out. It is neither an absence nor an abstention.

DossierCanada updates

What changed on the site, newest first
← Back to overview
Martin Archambault
Hi! My name is Martin Archambault I'm 45, and dossiercanada.ca is your first step into democracy!

If we want people to understand politics, it has to be brought down to their level.

When I first tried to take an interest in it, on top of not knowing the jargon, bills came as two lines… and fifty PDFs. Most people would simply walk away.

So I had an idea: use artificial intelligence first to read through all of it, then to put it in plain words. That's how DossierCanada was born.

Alongside the AI recap, I've given people a lexicon that explains the basics of political jargon. Plain-language law exists — think of this as its equivalent for politics!

Parliament glossary

Parliamentary jargon, translated into everyday language.
Account and follows