● 45th Parliament — 1st session   ● recorded nominal votes   ● bills tracked   ● bills challenged by citizens   ● independent citizen-run site · real public data    ● 45th Parliament — 1st session   ● recorded nominal votes   ● bills tracked   ● bills challenged by citizens   ● independent citizen-run site · real public data   
BCABSKMBONQCNBNSPENL
DossierCanada
QCNBNSPENL
100%
FR
Who sits, who legislates, who votes how

DossierCanada — who sits and votes in Canada's Parliament

Challenged bills

✋ Challenge a bill

Recently active bills

See all →

Federal MPs

Who represents you, how they vote, how often they sit.

The federal Cabinet

Who decides what, since when, and how they vote.
Up to date. These ministers come directly from the official Cabinet page on pm.gc.ca, scraped live — not a hand-maintained list.

C-288 — An Act to enact the Protection Against Online Fraud Act and to amend the Criminal Code

Every bill summarized in plain language. Not clear enough? Ask for an explanation.
All statusesIn progressDefeatedAssented to
House of CommonsSenateLobbying 43Omnibus 13
C-288 An Act to enact the Protection Against Online Fraud Act and to amend the Criminal Code 1 CPC In progress ▾
BILL C-288

An Act to enact the Protection Against Online Fraud Act and to amend the Criminal Code

Last activity : Outside the Order of Precedence
Private Member’s Bill · Sponsor : Melissa Lantsman
CPC In progress
Sponsor : Melissa Lantsman · House of Commons · Private Member’s Bill
Commons · 1st2026-06-17Commons · 2ndCommons · 3rdSenate · 1stSenate · 2ndSenate · 3rdRoyal assent
− Hide summary
What it does, in plain language
  • Creates the Protection Against Online Fraud Act, setting new duties for owners and operators of online platforms, including websites, apps, social media and online video gaming services.
  • Requires operators to design and run their products and services in ways that reasonably prevent fraudulent content from spreading.
  • Requires operators to take down any content identified as fraudulent from their platforms, websites or applications.
  • Obliges operators to set up a notification process and to alert users who interacted with fraudulent content, ensuring the notice has been read.
  • Requires operators to keep records of all removed content and notices sent, and to publish a report on the fraudulent content taken down.
  • Sets a fine of up to $1 million on summary conviction for operators that break these rules, with a defence if they show they exercised due diligence.
  • Amends the Criminal Code so that courts must treat a victim's vulnerability — including age, health and financial situation — as an aggravating factor when sentencing for identity theft or identity fraud.
  • Allows the Governor in Council to make regulations spelling out the required records and the form and content of the reports.

🤖 AI-generated from the bill’s official text as introduced — may not reflect amendments adopted since.

Registered lobbying 1 communication · 1 organization as of Sep 10, 2026 the 1 most recent +
FADOQ1
2026-07-15 · House of Commons
FADOQ
Met with : Melissa Lantsman — Member of Parliament for Thornhill Deputy Leader of the Opposition

Communications reported to the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying that name this bill. Lobbying is a lawful, publicly registered activity — this count is a fact, not a verdict. Only communications whose description names both the bill number and its title are counted, so the real total may be higher. Registry archive read on September 10, 2026; the Commissioner republishes it about monthly, and we refresh it by hand.

✋ What does “challenging” mean?

Clicking “Ask for an explanation” is a citizen request for the bill's sponsor to explain it in plain language — and for us to keep an eye on it together.

An account (email) is required — one request per person, no anonymous requests. 🔥 At 1,000 requests on the same bill, a public post is made, in the hope an MP agrees to sponsor a petition to the House.

It works on any bill, including one that has already received royal assent — that is often the one people want to understand.

Votes in the Commons

Every recorded vote — who voted what, and by what margin.
On the “who voted what” detail — the House of Commons publishes each member's name for every recorded (nominal) vote (Yea / Nay / paired). The by-member breakdown above (the "+" button on each row) comes directly from that official source (ourcommons.ca), not an estimate. The party shown next to each name is taken from the current House roster; people who have since left the House appear separately under "Former members".

How to read a vote

Recorded vote

Members vote one by one and each choice is entered in the public record. That is what lets us say exactly who voted what — no interpretation.

Passed is not law

A passed vote clears ONE stage. A bill must pass both chambers and then receive royal assent before it becomes law.

Paired is not absent

In the Commons, two members from opposing sides can agree not to vote: their voices cancel out. It is neither an absence nor an abstention.

DossierCanada updates

What changed on the site, newest first
← Back to overview
Martin Archambault
Hi! My name is Martin Archambault I'm 45, and dossiercanada.ca is your first step into democracy!

If we want people to understand politics, it has to be brought down to their level.

When I first tried to take an interest in it, on top of not knowing the jargon, bills came as two lines… and fifty PDFs. Most people would simply walk away.

So I had an idea: use artificial intelligence first to read through all of it, then to put it in plain words. That's how DossierCanada was born.

Alongside the AI recap, I've given people a lexicon that explains the basics of political jargon. Plain-language law exists — think of this as its equivalent for politics!

Parliament glossary

Parliamentary jargon, translated into everyday language.
Account and follows